Order top-quality essays and research papers now
x
The article by Verma et al. (2011) entitled “A Review on Impacts of Genetically Modified Food on Human Health” contains a study conducted to determine both positive and negative impacts of GMOs on human health. The study was qualitative in nature, whereby the authors reviewed all the available literature in relation to GMOs. Therefore, the main method of data collection was reviewing literature that is available on both positive and negative impacts of GMOs consumption on human health.
{t_essay_4}
The study argues that GMOs increase human resistance to various diseases. Secondly, it states that GMOs are rich in nutrition hence helping individuals have access to a balanced diet. Furthermore, it gives other non-human health benefits such as resistance to pests among others. On the other hand, the study provides numerous negative effects of GMOs on human health. These side effects are infertility, body immune problems, insulin regulation, accelerated aging, changes in the body major organs as well as the gastrointestinal process (Mishra et al, 2011). The risks of using GMOs arise due to the process of GM foods production, which tends to be unsafe and unpredictable since numerous alterations made in the process may result in the production of unhealthy food. The findings are valid as they rely on literature from reliable sources and there are no biases in the study as the authors give a balanced view on the benefits and demerits of GMOs on human health.
The study conducted by Anderson, Wachenheim, and Lesch (2006) entitled “Perceptions of Genetically Modified and Organic Foods and Processes” is aimed at showing the perceptions that people have towards GMOs. A quantitative research was conducted where respondents provided their view on the perceptions they have towards GMOs. Questionnaires were used as tools for data collection from the respondents related to the study. Additionally, descriptive statistical tools were used in the data analysis process. The study states that the majority of people are neutral concerning the benefits of GMOs. Apparently, the respondents are not quite aware of the risks that are associated with GMOs that makes most of the respondents impartial concerning the choice of the side.
However, they agree that GMOs have numerous tangible benefits on human health such as good nutrition among others (Anderson,Wachenheim, & Lesch, 2006). The biggest concern of the respondents is that information on the risks associated with the consumption of GMOs is not available to the consumers. The findings of the study are valid and reliable. The only problem of the study is that it is biased towards GMOs since it states that they are beneficial without taking into account the risks associated with them.
The chances of our team winning, which is against the argument that GMOs are beneficial to human health are high. The data in relation to health, environmental and economic impacts of GMOs are immensely reliable. The studies show that despite the numerous benefits associated with GMOs, there are also more costly impacts on the health of human beings. The issues of infertility and changes in body organs are some of the negative side effects related to the consumption of GMOs. The inability of data available to state the benefits of GMOs, and the information on the health risks associated with GM food consumption increases the chances of our team winning the debate. Furthermore, the risks depicted in the articles outweigh the benefits of using GMOs. Hence, based on the analysis of both sides of the argument, the probability of our team winning is immensely high.
Testimonials
What our client say
Fantastic work, writer #44948! The job you did on my research project cannot be matched. It was perfection! Thank you for working this hard and for helping me get another A+. I really appreciate what a good job you did.